Login / Register Submit Your Article
cover
Article Menu

Journal Browser
Vol. 6 (2024)
Vol. 5 (2023)
Vol. 4 (2022)
Vol. 3 (2021)
Vol. 2 (2020)
Vol. 1 (2019)
Open Access Journal Article

Designing for Social Impact: Community Engagement Projects

by Michael Thomas 1,*
1
Michael Thomas
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
FAD  2021 3(1):17; https://doi.org/10.69610/j.fad.20210313
Received: 29 January 2021 / Accepted: 18 February 2021 / Published Online: 13 March 2021
View Full-Text
Download PDF

Abstract

The title "Designing for Social Impact: Community Engagement Projects" encapsulates a multifaceted exploration into the realm of community engagement initiatives within the context of design. This paper investigates the intersection of design principles and social responsibility, focusing on projects that aim to create meaningful and sustainable changes within communities. It discusses the theoretical frameworks underpinning community engagement, emphasizing the importance of participatory design processes and the active involvement of community members in shaping the outcomes. The paper delves into various case studies, showcasing the successful implementation of community engagement projects that have had significant social impact. These cases highlight the strategies employed to address community needs, the challenges faced, and the outcomes achieved. The analysis reveals that successful community engagement projects require a nuanced understanding of social dynamics, effective communication, and the integration of local knowledge. The paper concludes with a discussion on the future of design for social impact, emphasizing the ongoing need for innovation, collaboration, and a commitment to social justice.

Keywords: Community engagement; - Social impact; - Participatory design; - Design for social responsibility; - Case studies.;
Copyright: © 2021 by Thomas. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
Cite This Paper
APA Style
Thomas, M. (2021). Designing for Social Impact: Community Engagement Projects. Frontiers of Art & Design, 3(1), 17. doi:10.69610/j.fad.20210313
ACS Style
Thomas, M. Designing for Social Impact: Community Engagement Projects. Frontiers of Art & Design, 2021, 3, 17. doi:10.69610/j.fad.20210313
AMA Style
Thomas M. Designing for Social Impact: Community Engagement Projects. Frontiers of Art & Design; 2021, 3(1):17. doi:10.69610/j.fad.20210313
Chicago/Turabian Style
Thomas, Michael 2021. "Designing for Social Impact: Community Engagement Projects" Frontiers of Art & Design 3, no.1:17. doi:10.69610/j.fad.20210313

Share and Cite

ACS Style
Thomas, M. Designing for Social Impact: Community Engagement Projects. Frontiers of Art & Design, 2021, 3, 17. doi:10.69610/j.fad.20210313
AMA Style
Thomas M. Designing for Social Impact: Community Engagement Projects. Frontiers of Art & Design; 2021, 3(1):17. doi:10.69610/j.fad.20210313
Chicago/Turabian Style
Thomas, Michael 2021. "Designing for Social Impact: Community Engagement Projects" Frontiers of Art & Design 3, no.1:17. doi:10.69610/j.fad.20210313
APA style
Thomas, M. (2021). Designing for Social Impact: Community Engagement Projects. Frontiers of Art & Design, 3(1), 17. doi:10.69610/j.fad.20210313

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

References

  1. Burbules, N. C., & Callister, T. A. (2000). Watch IT: The Risks and Promises of Information Technologies for Education. Westview Press.
  2. Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Basic Books.
  3. Edgerton, D. R. (1991). Participatory design: Principles and practice. John Wiley & Sons.
  4. Bowerman, N., & Smith, M. (2004). Community participation: A manual. Earthscan.
  5. Basset-Mensah, K. A., & Olowu, O. (2007). Community participation in development: A case study of the New Patriotic Party's 'Better Ghana' initiative. Journal of Development Studies, 43(6), 842-863.
  6. Doig, A., & Howie, P. (2001). Power, participation and community: Learning from a Scottish housing project. Progress in Human Geography, 25(1), 1-25.
  7. Tarrow, S. D. (2011). Power in movements. Cambridge University Press.
  8. Batty, M. (2002). Participatory design in action: The case of virtual community design. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 29(6), 835-850.
  9. Logan, J. R., & Molotch, H. L. (1987). Urban fortunes: The political economy of place. University of California Press.
  10. Kester, R. (2004). Design for social change: Strategies for sustainable community development. Routledge.
  11. Shove, E., Pantzar, M., & Watson, M. (2007). The dynamics of social technology. Routledge.
  12. Davis, B., & Salas, E. (2004). Communication in groups and teams. Sage Publications.
  13. Sveistrup, H., & Rasmussen, T. (2006). Inclusive design: How to create experiences for all. Aarhus School of Architecture Press.
  14. Keil, F., & Lichtenberg, J. (2001). Indigenous knowledge and sustainable development: Unpacking a paradigm. Development and Change, 32(3), 535-557.
  15. Wightman, A., & Yuen, C. (2008). Cultural sensitivity in design: A multi-disciplinary approach. Taylor & Francis.
  16. Batty, M., & Longley, P. A. (2002). A framework for evaluating the effectiveness of participatory design. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 29(6), 875-887.
  17. Flanagan, K., Glendinning, M., & Wiles, J. (2006). Measuring social impact: a review of the evidence. Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
  18. Cameron, D., Preece, J., & Andrews, G. (2001). Participatory design: Principles and practice. Springer.
  19. Bolt, T., Cameron, D., & Preece, J. (2002). Co-creation: A design strategy for involving users. In CHI '02 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 663-666). ACM.
  20. Gephart, M. J., Liechty, K. A., & Schonfeld, J. (2006). The role of information technology in community engagement: A review of the literature. Journal of Community Practice, 14(3-4), 73-100.
  21. Kester, R. (2010). Design for social change: A context-sensitive, iterative approach. Design Issues, 26(1), 30-42.